Free Novel Read

Studio (9780307817600) Page 2


  HENRY KOSTER, director of A Hundred Men and a Girl

  ERNEST LEHMAN, writer-producer of Hello, Dolly!

  PERRY LIEBER, former head of West Coast publicity

  FRANK MC CARTHY, a film producer and friend of General Omar Bradley

  MARY ANN MC GOWAN, secretary to Richard Zanuck

  HARRY MC INTYRE, a Studio executive

  BARBARA MC LEAN, head of the Studio’s cutting department

  OWEN MC LEAN, head of the Studio’s casting department

  TED MANN, a Minnesota theater magnate

  IRVING MANSFIELD, husband of Jacqueline Susann

  DANIEL MASSEY, an actor

  ARNOLD MAXIN, a music publisher

  LOUIS MERMAN, assistant head of the Studio’s production department

  PAUL MONASH, a film and television producer

  FRANK NEILL, a Studio press agent

  LIONEL NEWMAN, head of the Studio’s music department

  JOE PASTERNAK, producer of The Sweet Ride

  DAVID RAPHEL, vice president in charge of international sales

  DON RECORD, a title designer

  JERRY REYNOLDS, an engineer from the Boeing Aircraft Corporation

  JONAS ROSENFIELD, the Studio’s vice president in charge of publicity

  ED ROTHMAN, an agent for Ashley-Famous Artists Agency

  FRANKLIN SCHAFFNER, director of Planet of the Apes

  IRENE SHARAFF, costume designer of Hello, Dolly

  RICHARD SHEPHERD, an agent for Creative Management Associates

  SPYROS SKOURAS, chairman of the board, Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation

  MILT SMITH, a Studio press agent

  HARRY SOKOLOV, executive assistant to Richard Zanuck

  SONNY, as in “Sonny & Cher”

  BARBRA STREISAND, a film star

  JACQUELINE SUSANN, an authoress

  NATALIE TRUNDY, friend to Arthur Jacobs

  DAVID WEISBART, producer of Valley of the Dolls

  ELMO WILLIAMS, producer of Tora, Tora, Tora

  ROBERT WISE, director of Star!

  EVARTS ZIEGLER, partner in the Ziegler-Ross Agency

  FRED ZINNEMANN, a film director

  “As a story it was reasonable enough to pass, and I sometimes believed what I said and tried to take the cure in the very real sun of Desert D’Or with its cactus, its mountain, and the bright green foliage of its love and its money.”

  Norman Mailer, The Deer Park

  1

  “And now he’s working for me,”

  Darryl Zanuck said

  Shortly after two o’clock on the afternoon of May 16, 1967, Darryl F. Zanuck stepped out of an elevator on the eighteenth floor of the Waldorf-Astoria Hotel in New York. He was wearing sunglasses and smoking a large black cigar and in the lapel buttonhole of his well-tailored blue blazer was the rosette of the Legion d’Honneur. In his wake, stopping when he stopped, walking when he walked, trailed a convoy of equally well-tailored men in the employ of the Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation, over whose annual stockholders’ meeting Zanuck was scheduled to preside that afternoon in the Waldorf’s Starlight Roof. Leading the convoy, but a half step behind his father, the dauphin to the king, was Zanuck’s only son, Richard Darryl Zanuck, a member of the board of directors of the Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation and the Studio’s Los Angeles-based executive vice president in charge of world-wide production.

  As Darryl Zanuck entered the meeting room, a number of stockholders rose and began to applaud. The elder Zanuck paid no attention, and he seated the young woman with him, a slender French girl in a green silk Pucci dress, in a chair at the rear of the room. Then he headed for the dais, shaking hands with board members and embracing old friends as he went. Over the dais hung the green, gold and black flag of the Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation. Already in his place at the end of the front table on the dais was Fox’s chairman of the board, Spyros P. Skouras. During the years when Darryl Zanuck held the same post his son holds now, Skouras had chaired these annual meetings, but on this afternoon, he sat impassively, looking like an aging white-maned lion, his hands folded in front of him.

  Darryl Zanuck took his place at the lectern, his son in a chair immediately to his right. The cigar was still implanted in Darryl Zanuck’s mouth. “Well, here we go again,” he said to Richard Zanuck. The microphone picked up his nasal Nebraska twang and there was a titter from the audience. Darryl Zanuck glared impatiently and then called the meeting to order, placing the agenda in front of him. Suddenly he stopped and took off his sunglasses.

  “Are these the right goddamn glasses?” he said. “For Christ’s sake, no.”

  He replaced the sunglasses with reading glasses and began to introduce the members of the board and Studio executives sitting on the double-tiered dais. When he came to his son, he stopped, fumbling for effect: “On my right, I can’t remember his name, heh, heh, now I’ve got it, Richard Zanuck.”

  There was an appreciative laugh from the audience. Darryl Zanuck continued the introductions. “At the end of the table, a man—I worked for him once, I overthrew him once, I took the company away from him once, and now he’s working for me, but I still have the greatest affection for him, Mr. Spyros Skouras.”

  Spyros Skouras did not move a muscle.

  Each stockholder attending the meeting had been provided with a thirty-two-page four-color annual report which attested to Twentieth Century Fox’s robust financial health. The Sound of Music, with a gross approaching $100 million, was the most successful film in motion picture history, there were over thirty other feature films in various stages of production, and the television department had ten shows totaling nine hours of prime-time viewing on the network airwaves. Gross revenues of the company were $227,259,000 for fiscal 1966, earnings before taxes $23,763,000, net earnings after taxes $12,504,000, earnings per share of stock $4.28. Richard Zanuck’s salary was $150,000 with an additional $150,000 a year deferred; one television producer was being paid $435,000 a year, another $365,000 a year.

  With the reading of the financial statement, the meeting was thrown open for questions. There were no complaints from the stockholders. A resolution was introduced praising Darryl Zanuck for his running of the company. Less than two hours after it began, the annual meeting of the Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation was adjourned.

  Five years before, the Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation had been flat on its back. In 1962, Fox lost $39.8 million after taxes, and in the three preceding years the company had lost an additional $48.5 million in feature film production. To keep itself going, the Studio had sold 260 of its 334 acres just outside Beverly Hills to the Aluminum Company of America for $43 million. In Rome, production had started on Cleopatra, which began to sop up money faster than Fox could pour it in. The Studio was dying. Bankruptcy threatened, the sound stages were closed, the parking lots were empty. Spyros Skouras was fired as president, and Darryl Zanuck, after first threatening a proxy fight, was elected to take his place and save the sinking ship.

  The reversal of fortunes of the Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation had long interested me, for the vicissitudes of that studio seemed to suggest not only the modus operandi of all studios, of all motion picture people, but something else as well: I had the feeling that by spending some time at the Studio I could get close to the texture of life in the subtropical abstraction that used to be called The Motion Picture Capital of the World; that by watching motion picture people at work I could see and perhaps understand their ethic. I had been exposed to the motion picture industry at oblique angles ever since I arrived in Los Angeles in 1964, and some of its working arrangements seemed to me far more magical than that glamour for which the Industry was noted: there was the way in which failure escalated the possibilities of success, the way in which price bore no relation to demand. There was the way in which millions of dollars were gambled on ephemeral, unpredictable and, uncomfortably often, invalid ideas of marketability. There was the way that many, perhaps
most, people in the Industry remained unconscious of their own myths and superstitions. There was the Eldorado mood of life in the capital, the way in which social and economic fortunes could shoot up or plummet down, as in a mining boom town, on no more than rumors, the hint of a rich vein, the gossip that the lode was played out.

  All this seemed interesting to me, and not entirely for its own sake: the truly absorbing aspect of the motion picture ethic, of course, is that it affects not only motion picture people but almost everyone alive in the United States today. By adolescence, children have been programmed with a set of responses and life lessons learned almost totally from motion pictures, television and the recording industry. It is difficult to banish the notion of one’s own life situations as part of a scenario, appropriately scored: “Lara’s Theme” for an ill-starred love, “Colonel Bogey’s March” for indomitable courage, “Waltzing Mathilda” for bittersweet apocalypse. Few situations fail to evoke a cinematic response; in matters of principle we play High Noon, in renunciation scenes Casablanca. (“Walter, Barton T. Keyes is a great man,” Edward G. Robinson says about himself to Fred MacMurray in Double Indemnity, and whenever I am feeling particularly pleased with myself, the line comes back.) In pictures, there is no problem without a solution: the Mafia has been cut down to size at every studio from Burbank to Culver City; Gregory Peck has personally taken on anti-Semitism, the Bomb, and Southern bigotry, licked them all, and we all feel, however spuriously, the better for it.

  Movies, moreover, have given most Americans their entire fix on how other Americans live. How many of us grew up thinking of the medical profession in terms of Not As a Stranger, of the literary life as The Snows of Kilimanjaro, of heroin addiction as The Man with the Golden Arm? The South was Gone with the Wind, and later The Long Hot Summer; the Catholic priesthood, Going My Way. For the socially mobile, movies have constituted an infinitely accessible, if infinitely inaccurate, primer in traditional social behavior. This very inaccuracy of social milieu in Hollywood pictures—the rich in Southampton do not wear white dinner jackets in the summer (From the Terrace), United States Senators do not drive Rolls-Royces (Seven Days in May), army officers do not salute as if they are hailing a cab, nor do they allow enlisted men to call them by their first names (any picture about the military)—seemed to suggest that Hollywood lives at a considerable remove from the rest of the society, lives and thrives entirely on its own myths. In some ways Hollywood seemed a perfect example of a closed and inbred society, and the Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation, not long ago on the brink of ruin, now the most successful studio in Hollywood, itself shored up by all the basic tenets of the Industry, seemed the best place to observe it in action.

  And so, some time ago, I arranged to follow the Studio’s activities over the course of a single year, to see how some of the people there got along, got ahead, fell behind, stayed in place, and, above all, fabricated the myth. What I hoped to find at the end of that year was something of the state of mind called Hollywood.

  The day I arrived in the small austere lobby of Fox’s administration building in Los Angeles, an elderly Studio policeman stood guard behind a glassed enclosure, examining each person entering the building before pressing a button opening the door into the Studio’s inner sanctum. Beside him was a clipboard on which was written:

  North Reception

  Pico Time Gate

  Okays for Monday March 22

  26 musicians Stage 1, 1 P.M.

  Duke Goldstone Party to Peyton Place

  New Gate Okays

  Alex Cord—actor

  Gila Golan—actress

  Sonia Roberts TV writer will be in 22 Old Writers

  Peggy Shaw TV writer will be in 21 Old Writers

  The following will be pulled from files

  Thomas, Jerry—TV writer

  Richard Zanuck’s office is just across the hall from his father’s, but at that time, the elder Zanuck had not once returned to Hollywood since he had taken over the Studio. He preferred to remain in New York where the books are kept and the financial decisions made, leaving the picture making to his son. The suite occupied by Richard Zanuck is cavernous. It is dark-paneled and on the wall hang art department sketches of forthcoming Fox productions. Behind his desk, in a gold frame, there is a color photograph of his ex-wife, Lili, and their two daughters, Virginia and Janet, as well as two pairs of bronzed baby shoes. There is no hint of show business in the office, no framed Variety headlines, no pictures of movie stars with fulsome messages of endearment, no sentimental props from old Fox films. On the mantel over the fireplace there is a four-clock console, showing the time in Los Angeles, New York, London and Paris, and in the adjoining bar-dressing room are leatherbound scripts of all the pictures Fox has made since Richard Zanuck took over as production chief. The anonymity of the office is in a way reflective of what it means today to be a production chief in the new Hollywood, dominated as it is by the independent producers. As much as is possible, Richard Zanuck tries to function by the rules prevailing in Hollywood before the independents took over, guarding Fox’s slowly eroding right to shape every picture from story conference to cutting room. But it is virtually impossible today for a production chief to put his personal stamp on a picture in the way that Darryl Zanuck did. He is, in many ways, a traffic manager, whose flexibility of action is far more limited than that of, say, the chief executive of an automobile company. Instead of assembling a “package”—story, talent, director, producer—he is more apt to be presented with one, take it or leave it. If he takes, which means putting up the money and providing the facilities, and he ends up with a Lord Jim—Hollywood’s equivalent of the Edsel—his job is in jeopardy, although he had almost nothing to do with the making of the picture.

  Richard Zanuck shook my hand and asked his secretary to bring us each a cup of coffee. He is a tightly controlled man with the build of a miniaturized halfback, twelve-month tan, receding brown hair and manicured fingernails that are chewed to the quick. He has hesitant blue eyes, a quick embarrassed smile and a prominent jaw whose muscles he reflexively keeps knotting and unknotting. He was wearing a monogrammed Sulka shirt and a gray hopsack suit. He blew on his coffee to cool it, and as he sipped, he reflected on the state of the Studio when he took over in 1962.

  The demise of Fox had actually begun a half dozen years before, in 1956, when Darryl Zanuck had resigned as vice president in charge of production. The elder Zanuck was a tycoon in Hollywood when the title carried with it feudal power and virtual droit de seigneur. He came out of Nebraska after World War I, parlayed a novel which was underwritten by a patent medicine maker into a Hollywood writing job, wrote a series of films for Rin Tin Tin, became production chief at Warner Brothers at twenty-four, and founded Twentieth Century Fox with Joseph Schenk at thirty-one. “He has so many yes-men following him around the Studio,” Fred Allen once observed, “he ought to put out his hand when he makes a sharp turn,” but he won three Academy Awards and two Irving Thalberg Awards and came closer to the ideal of Thalberg (the prototype of Scott Fitzgerald’s last tycoon, Monroe Stahr) than any other Hollywood mogul.

  But the advent of television, in 1948, had changed the face of Darryl Zanuck’s Hollywood. Weekly audiences shrank from a peak of 90 million customers in the halcyon days to 30 million, and feature film production fell from a high of 600 a year to less than 150. With production so sharply curtailed, the studios were no longer able to keep under contract a complete roster of stars, producers, directors and writers. Independent producers moved into the void and agents became the new czars of Hollywood, allocating to their clients the profits and perquisites that once had belonged solely to the studios. The changes dismayed Darryl Zanuck, and he quit as Fox’s production chief, went to Paris and formed an independent production company. Richard Zanuck joined him there as a story and production assistant.

  The younger Zanuck was born in 1934. There was no paternal coddling. Even when his son was a child, Darryl Zanuck took delight in trounc
ing him at checkers. Nor was Richard Zanuck allowed to win a point at badminton until he was big enough to ram the shuttlecock down his father’s throat. He attended Harvard Military School in Los Angeles and after that graduated from Stanford. Summers he worked at the Studio, first on the labor gang and in the editing room, then in the advertising department in New York, and finally in Paris, as his father’s assistant. In 1959, tied up in Africa with another picture, Darryl Zanuck gave his son a chance to produce Compulsion, a fictional re-enactment of the Leopold-Loeb case. Richard Zanuck brought Compulsion in under budget, ahead of schedule and good enough for its two stars, Bradford Dillman and Dean Stockwell, to win best acting awards at the Cannes Film Festival.

  Meanwhile, back in the U.S., Twentieth Century Fox had fallen on lean days. Management was ineffectual and the production reins finally passed to Spyros Skouras, the Greek theater owner and company president who had always been content in the past to watch the books and let Darryl Zanuck supervise the picture making. At a time when other studios were retrenching in the face of television, Skouras pushed through dud after dud; with the sale of the back lot and the debacle of Cleopatra, the company was in a state of financial ruin. Then, after repeated absences, Marilyn Monroe was fired off a picture called Something’s Got to Give and she went home and not too long afterward committed suicide. The picture was scrapped for a $2 million loss. It was the last straw. The board of directors issued a terse, three-paragraph announcement saying Skouras had been forced to “resign” because of “ill health.”

  From his headquarters in Paris, Darryl Zanuck, who was drawing a $150,000 annual consultant’s fee from Fox, watched the company scramble for a new management. His family’s large bloc of Fox stock—something in the vicinity of 100,000 shares—seemed in danger of going down the drain, as did his own production of the World War II epic, The Longest Day, which he had planned to release through Fox as a hard-ticket, roadshow picture, but which the panicked studio was preparing to saturation-book across the country. “I looked around for someone to recommend to them,” he said later, “but found no one who would be an improvement.” Except himself.